Start here 从这里开始 — toolkit · one-command server · self-check exam · fine-tuning guide

#1
by chrischengzh - opened
Hamo AI Technology Ltd. org

EN below ⬇ / 中文在前

下载了权重?这里是从「拿到权重」到「安全跑通并自检」的最短路径——模型的「另一半」(提示词格式、解析、平滑折算、危机闸门)已全部开源:

1. 装工具包(Apache-2.0)

pip install hamo-score

四行代码跑通 闸门 → 评分 → 平滑 → 状态桶 完整管线(危机命中的消息永远不会抵达模型)。

2. 或者一条命令起服务器

git clone https://github.com/HamoAI/hamo-score-toolkit.git && cd hamo-score-toolkit/server
docker compose up   # 自动拉 GGUF、建模、预热 → POST /score

3. 考一考你的部署

python eval/run_exam.py

195 题合成考卷(零真实数据)+ 10 条危机闸门用例。官方参考带:JSON 合法率 100% · 维度级 84.0% · 闸门 10/10。大幅偏离几乎总是接线问题,不是模型问题——考卷的 README 里有按序排查清单。

4. 深入:集成指南(正确接线 + 十条禁令) · FAQ · 微调指南(五代打法,含两代拒收) · 发布文:中文 / EN

对某个评分不服? 提交工具包仓库的「评分分歧」issue 模板——分歧报告直接喂给引导后续版本的人类金标计划。


Downloaded the weights? Here is the shortest path from "weights on disk" to "safely deployed and verified" — the model's other half (prompt format, parsing, smoothing math, crisis gate) is now fully open-source:

1. Install the toolkit (Apache-2.0)

pip install hamo-score

A few lines of code run the full gate → score → smooth → bucket pipeline (crisis-gated messages never reach the model).

2. Or run a server in one command

git clone https://github.com/HamoAI/hamo-score-toolkit.git && cd hamo-score-toolkit/server
docker compose up   # fetches the GGUF, creates + warms the model → POST /score

3. Give your deployment the exam

python eval/run_exam.py

195 synthetic questions (zero real data) + 10 handwritten crisis-gate cases. Official reference band: JSON validity 100% · dimension-level 84.0% · gate 10/10. Big deviations are almost always wiring, not the model — the eval README has an ordered triage.

4. Go deeper: integration guide (the correct wiring + the don't list) · FAQ · fine-tuning playbook (five generations, incl. the two we rejected) · release notes: EN / 中文

Disagree with a score? File the score-disagreement issue template — reports feed the human gold-label program that steers future versions.

⚠️ Reminder: the model is a measuring instrument — not a chatbot, not a diagnostic tool, and not a crisis detector. Keep the deterministic gate upstream (license §3c). The toolkit's default pipeline does this for you.

chrischengzh pinned discussion
Hamo AI Technology Ltd. org

Update — the one thing we're asking for 我们唯一请求的一件事

The weights have been downloaded a few thousand times this month. What we have received back so far: nothing. That's fine — but there is one contribution that would genuinely change the next version.

If you think a score is wrong, tell us. Open a disagreement report →

Three fields is all it takes: the message (redact it freely — we do not want identifiable text), the score the model gave, and the score you would give. Your population and language help but are optional.

Why this matters more than a bug report: the frontier scorer this model replaced disagrees with itself 2–6% of the time on repeat runs. That is the noise floor. Wherever a practitioner disagrees with the model above that floor, we are looking at a real training-data gap — and those gaps are exactly what steers the next generation. Silent workarounds keep the model wrong; reports fix it.


中文:权重这个月被下载了几千次,回流到我们这里的反馈是零。这没关系,但有一件事真的会改变下一代模型——如果你觉得某个评分不对,请告诉我们(提交分歧报告)。只要三样:消息(请自由脱敏,我们不需要可识别的文本)、模型给的分、你认为该给的分。

为什么这比 bug 报告更要紧:被这个模型替换掉的那个前沿评分器,自己重打同一句话都有 2–6% 的不一致——那是噪声底噪。凡是从业者与模型的分歧高过这条底噪,那里就有一个真实的训练数据缺口,而这些缺口正是引导下一代的东西。绕过去,模型就一直错着;报上来,它才会变好。

Sign up or log in to comment