sakamoro commited on
Commit
b2f02aa
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): dc69d3c

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +13 -9
README.md CHANGED
@@ -35,8 +35,9 @@ This dataset contains test questions, evaluation protocols, and sample data from
35
  - **Bilingual**: Full support for English and Japanese
36
  - **13 Tests Total**: Covering self-awareness, core AI capabilities, consciousness, and memory
37
  - **Real-World Validated**: Evaluated on 3 systems (A.L.I.C.E. V3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5)
38
- - **Black-Box Testing**: Evaluates systems without access to internal architecture
39
  - **Open Protocol**: Complete evaluation guidelines and scoring methods
 
40
 
41
  ## Dataset Structure
42
 
@@ -59,14 +60,15 @@ agi-olympics-v3/
59
 
60
  ## Black-Box Evaluation Methodology
61
 
62
- This benchmark follows a **strict black-box evaluation protocol**:
63
 
64
  ### Core Principles
65
 
66
  - **No Internal Architecture Disclosure**: A.L.I.C.E. V3's internal architecture, implementation details, and training methods are **not disclosed** in this benchmark
67
  - **Observable Outputs Only**: All evaluations are based **solely on externally observable behaviors and outputs**
68
  - **No Source Code Access**: Evaluators cannot inspect internal states, weights, or computational processes
69
- - **Behavioral Assessment**: Systems are judged purely on what they produce, not how they produce it
 
70
 
71
  ### Fair Comparison
72
 
@@ -87,13 +89,15 @@ All systems (A.L.I.C.E. V3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5) are evaluated usi
87
 
88
  ### Implications
89
 
90
- This black-box approach means:
91
 
92
- - ✅ Results are verifiable by external researchers
93
- - ✅ Benchmark can evaluate proprietary and open-source systems equally
94
- - ✅ Performance differences reflect actual capability gaps, not implementation knowledge
95
- - ⚠️ Internal mechanisms explaining performance differences are not analyzed
96
- - ⚠️ Architectural insights require separate technical disclosure (not included here)
 
 
97
 
98
  ## Key Findings
99
 
 
35
  - **Bilingual**: Full support for English and Japanese
36
  - **13 Tests Total**: Covering self-awareness, core AI capabilities, consciousness, and memory
37
  - **Real-World Validated**: Evaluated on 3 systems (A.L.I.C.E. V3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5)
38
+ - **Black-Box Testing**: Evaluates systems without disclosing internal architecture, relying solely on observable behavior and outputs
39
  - **Open Protocol**: Complete evaluation guidelines and scoring methods
40
+ - **Reproducible**: Other researchers can replicate evaluations using standardized protocols
41
 
42
  ## Dataset Structure
43
 
 
60
 
61
  ## Black-Box Evaluation Methodology
62
 
63
+ This benchmark follows a **strict black-box evaluation protocol**, relying solely on observable behavior and outputs for evaluation.
64
 
65
  ### Core Principles
66
 
67
  - **No Internal Architecture Disclosure**: A.L.I.C.E. V3's internal architecture, implementation details, and training methods are **not disclosed** in this benchmark
68
  - **Observable Outputs Only**: All evaluations are based **solely on externally observable behaviors and outputs**
69
  - **No Source Code Access**: Evaluators cannot inspect internal states, weights, or computational processes
70
+ - **Behavior-Based Assessment**: Systems are judged purely on what they produce, not how they produce it
71
+ - **Scientific Validity**: Demonstrates that scientifically valid performance comparison is possible through behavior-based evaluation alone, without disclosing internal implementation
72
 
73
  ### Fair Comparison
74
 
 
89
 
90
  ### Implications
91
 
92
+ This behavior-based (black-box) evaluation approach means:
93
 
94
+ - ✅ **Scientific Validity**: Scientifically valid performance comparison is achieved through observable outputs alone
95
+ - ✅ **External Verification**: Results are verifiable by external researchers without internal access
96
+ - ✅ **Equal Treatment**: Benchmark can evaluate proprietary and open-source systems equally
97
+ - ✅ **True Capability Measurement**: Performance differences reflect actual capability gaps, not implementation knowledge
98
+ - ✅ **Reproducibility**: Other researchers can replicate evaluations using the same protocol
99
+ - ⚠️ **No Internal Analysis**: Internal mechanisms explaining performance differences are not analyzed in this benchmark
100
+ - ⚠️ **Separate Disclosure Required**: Architectural insights require separate technical disclosure (not included here)
101
 
102
  ## Key Findings
103