Improving Proactive AI Assistance with Hierarchical Procedural Understanding
Abstract
Proactive AI assistants continuously observe a user's activity and decide whether to provide new guidance or remain silent. They should provide appropriate guidance for the task, determine when to provide the next guidance based on task progress, and adjust the guidance level to the user's expertise and needs. Supporting these capabilities requires training and evaluation data that reflect procedural structure and capture how guidance should adapt to task progress and user needs. However, existing datasets either focus on detection-based proactive understanding or provide procedural guidance at a fixed granularity. Fixed-granularity guidance provides limited information about fine-grained progress and broader procedural context, making it difficult to determine completion and adapt guidance granularity. To address these limitations, we introduce the ProactiveCoach suite, comprising ProactiveCoach-Instruct for training, ProactiveCoachBench for evaluation, and fine-tuned VLMs with an adaptive guidance system. ProactiveCoach-Instruct provides hierarchically structured guidance at the phase, step, and action levels for learning task progress and procedural context. ProactiveCoachBench evaluates whether models provide appropriate guidance at the right time across different guidance levels and adapt when the requested level changes. We fine-tune pretrained VLMs on ProactiveCoach-Instruct and demonstrate its effectiveness across backbones. Compared with fixed-granularity supervision, hierarchical supervision improves overall performance across backbones by up to 9.6%p. We further build an adaptive guidance system by combining our fine-tuned model with a lightweight guidance router. Without additional fine-tuning, our system outperforms the in-context adaptation baseline by 57.1%p across four guidance-level transitions. Our project page is available at https://jinsuby.github.io/ProactiveCoach/.
Community
ProactiveCoach introduces hierarchical phase–step–action guidance data, a benchmark, and a VLM learning method for timely procedural assistance that adapts to the user’s requested level of detail.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- EgoArgus: Benchmarking VLMs as Situational Assistants for Modality-Grounded User Supports (2026)
- SkillRubric: Co-Evolving Actor Guidance and Evaluator Rubrics for Multimodal Agents (2026)
- DYAD: A Multimodal Dataset of Co-Located Human Assistance (2026)
- Relevance Does Not Imply Applicability: Experience Activation for Personal GUI Agents (2026)
- CAST: Critique-Aware Supervision for Training Reliable Long-Horizon Tool-Calling Agents (2026)
- Companion-style QA Assistance in Ego-Vision (2026)
- AutoCompact: Learning When to Compact Context in Long-Horizon Coding Agents (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.06505 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper